Bob Hill from the Fire Academy and Paul Sandrock from the Camden
County Fire Academy has met and the majority of the firefighter 1 course
will be taught at our Academy and the necessary classes will be held at the
Camden County Fire Academy. Fire Company drills can still be held at the
Fire Academy, using the remaining props.
The County fire departments have to continue to show support for the fire
academy, as all discussions with the College always questions the usage of
the Academy by the County Fire Departments.
Bob Hill motion that the Association go on record showing that there is
strong interest in maintaining fire training in this County seconded by Bruce
Scott. A vote was taken with the results being unanimous.
Freeholder Chila advised that that he had met previously with the Fire
Academy Committee, but had heard nothing after their first meeting. He
stated that the Freeholder board wants to make sure that the County
firefighters are trained and safe. He asked what the numbers for what is
needed are. He suggested we come up with a plan, and he will work for
what is needed. A discussion was held on what type of structure is needed
for training, and that there should be a short and long term plan for the fire
academy. Anthony Baldasaro motion that we invite Senator Sweeny to our
September meeting seconded by Rick Crane. There were questions if we
want Senator Sweeny to attend the meeting. Al Giampola motion to table
the motion to invite Senator Sweeny, seconded by Pat Robinson. As there is
already a motion on the floor, Al Giampola's motion was not acted upon. Al
Giampola then stated that a motion to table would supersede the original
motion. However he rescinded his motion to table. A vote was the taken on
the motion to invite Senator Sweeny to the September meeting, that vote did
not pass. Motion was denied.
Under Robert's Rules of Order, the subsidiary motion to table is, properly,
used only when it is necessary to suspend consideration of a main motion in
order to deal with another matter that has come up unexpectedly and which
must be dealt with before the pending motion can be properly addressed.
[4]
It
has, however, become common to misuse the motion to end consideration of
the pending main motion without debate, or to mistakenly assume that its
adoption prevents further consideration of the main motion at all, or until a
specified time.